<rp id="qv7vz"><meter id="qv7vz"><strike id="qv7vz"></strike></meter></rp>

<cite id="qv7vz"><span id="qv7vz"><delect id="qv7vz"></delect></span></cite>
  • <rt id="qv7vz"></rt>

      1. <u id="qv7vz"></u>

        <cite id="qv7vz"></cite>

        <cite id="qv7vz"></cite>

        點擊咨詢 新航道全國學校

        我堅持,我成功!

        SAT(美國高考)

        SAT香港考試團起航夢想
        當前位置:首頁 >SAT > SAT寫作 > 正文
        SAT寫作真題范文 | “招招得分” 第【2】篇!
        2020-04-16 16:36   作者:新航道   閱讀量:

             我們找到一篇典型的有許多“修辭性問題”的材料文A Carbon Tax Beats a Vacuum Ban(2016年6月亞太地區考題)

          Wait a sec. First things first. What are the“修辭性問題”?

          用人話說,“修辭性問題”就是“明知故問的問題”。

          明明可以用陳述的方式直說,偏要用提問的方式說,成為一種修辭手法。

          這就是“修辭性問題”沒錯了。

        image.png

          我們可以在A Carbon Tax Beats a Vacuum Ban(2016年6月亞太地區考題)這篇文章的開頭幾個段落里找到許多問句,這些問句在被作者提出后又被作者回答了。這些問題就是明知故問嘛。

          Those rhetorical questions, apparently more emotional and effective than plain statements, convey the author’s intense sarcasm to the vacuum ban. The author obviously has answers to those questions and, however, deliberately asks questions, and by answering those questions, the author has a channel to deliver his strong opposition to the ban by brief yet strong answers. Meanwhile, the multiple times of using those questions throughout Paragraph 3 and Paragraph 4 increase the intensity of the author’s aversion to the ban. As the intensity is well delivered, through those questions, this wording technique—asking rhetorical questions—has an impact on the readers, enabling them to agree with the author.

          厲害了,發現了么,除了黃色高亮部分,別的語句,可都是分析“修辭性問題”的固定話術呢。

          哦,對了,最后必須告訴大家:“修辭性問題”可不就是反問句或者設問句嘛。

          那么,突然之間,你仿(ken)佛(ding)一下子全明白了。


        熱門專題
        熱門文章
          戰略合作單位
          东京熟v在线